RESUMEN
Background: We compared the effects of home- vs gym-based delivery modes of two 8-week supervised multicomponent intensity training regimes on cardiorespiratory fitness and arterial stiffness in 17 adults with intellectual and developmental disability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants were assigned to sprint interval training or continuous aerobic training, both incorporating resistance training. The intervention started with 8-weeks of online training (M1-M2), 1-month of detraining, plus 8-weeks of gym-based training (M3-M4). Results: Peak oxygen uptake decreased from M1-M2 and increased from M2-M4. Central arterial stiffness decreased between M1-M2, and M1-M4, along with peripheral arterial stiffness. Central systolic blood pressure decreased from M1-M2 only with sprint interval training. Conclusion: Home-based training minimized the negative impact of the lockdown on central arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, but it did not match the benefits on cardiorespiratory fitness and peripheral arterial stiffness of a gym-based intervention, irrespective of the multicomponent intensity training regime. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05701943.
RESUMEN
Provision of shade reduces radiant heat load on feedlot cattle, thus reducing demand of water and energy for thermoregulation. While the positive effects of shade on animal welfare are widely known, the literature lacks data on the magnitude of its economic impacts. In this study, we propose the concept of novel shade design to prove that a correctly oriented and dimensioned roof structure, which optimizes shade to be displaced within the pens, motivates cattle to seek shade, protect them from short-wave solar radiation, and is resilient to counteract weather adverse conditions. The beneficial outcome is improvement in animal welfare and productive performance, as well as increments on financial return and sustainability. To attest these benefits, eight hundred B. indicus × Bos taurus bulls were randomly assigned in pens with or without shade from a galvanized steel-roof structure. Performance data (e.g., dry matter intake, body weight gain, feed efficiency and hot carcass weight) and heat stress indicators (e.g., subcutaneous temperature, body-surface temperature, respiratory rate and water intake) were assessed along the study period. The economic outcomes derived from shade implementation were determined using the net present value. Meteorological variables were also monitored every 1 min, and grouped in a thermal comfort index for feedlot cattle, the InComfort Index (InCI). The shade structure efficiently reduced radiant heat load on cattle in pens with shade. According to the classification of the InCI, during very hot days (InCI > 0.6; around noon with mean solar radiation above 800 W m-2 and mean air temperature above 33°C), greater proportion (80%) of animals in shaded pens were using shade. Under such circumstances, cattle in shade had water intake reduced by 3.4 L per animal, body temperature was lower by 5°C, subcutaneous temperature was lower by 1°C and respiration rate was lower by 10 breaths min-1 compared to animals in pens without shade (P = 0.0001). Although dry matter intake was similar (P = 0.6805), cattle in pens with shade had higher average daily gain reflected in a heavier hot carcass weight (8 kg animal-1; P = 0.0002). Considering an initial investment of $90 per animal to build a structure that lasts 15 years, the expected payback time is four finishing cycles (~110 days per cycle). In conclusion, this study confirms that the proposed novel shade design is economically profitable, improves performance, and enhances animal welfare.
RESUMEN
Closed colorimetric paper disc chambers and flow-through ventilated capsules are the most employed methods of measuring rates of local cutaneous evaporative water loss in cattle. However, we do not know if these methods show a close agreement with the total rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss derived from the weighing system (i.e., the gold standard method). We therefore combined a high-precision weighing system and flow through respirometry to accurately quantify the cutaneous evaporative water loss rates in shaded heifers, while simultaneously recording parallel data obtained from a flow-through ventilated capsule, and a closed colorimetric paper disc chamber. Least square means of the local surface-specific cutaneous evaporative water loss rate (g m-2 h-1) derived from the colorimetric paper discs and ventilated capsules show close agreement to the total rate of surface-specific cutaneous evaporative water loss (g m-2 h-1) derived from the weighing method. Likewise, fitted linear regression lines also showed that they were well correlated (e.g., R2 = 0.93 and r = 0.96 for ventilated capsule vs weighing method; and R2 = 0.81 and r = 0.91 for colorimetric paper discs vs weighing method). However, the mean square deviation revealed various sources of disagreement between the local measurements and those derived from the weighing method, in which the local rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss derived from colorimetric paper discs showed greater deviation. In conclusion, given the importance of cutaneous evaporative water loss for assessing temperature requirements and heat tolerance of cattle, our findings show large discrepancies derived from the closed colorimetric paper discs chamber when compared with parallel data derived from the gold standard method, which is sufficient to call into question previous findings obtained by employing such methods. Moreover, the flow-through ventilated capsule appears to be the most accurate method to assess the local rate of cutaneous evaporative water loss in cattle.
